Glyco Property List
Pooled literature properties (glycanDB). Optional filters: ?dataset=uv_vis&property_key=...
GET /api/gdd/glyco-properties/?format=api&page=27
{ "count": 839, "next": "http://glycodata.org/api/gdd/glyco-properties/?format=api&page=28", "previous": "http://glycodata.org/api/gdd/glyco-properties/?format=api&page=26", "results": [ { "id": 521, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "spruce-pine wood cellulose", "entity_group": "dissolving/wood pulp", "entity_class": "native cellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "76.0", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "75-77", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Review", "method_detail": "XRD Rietveld refinement", "conditions": "XRD Rietveld refinement", "conditions_detail": "XRD Rietveld refinement | measurement: XRD Rietveld | allomorph: I | source: spruce-pine wood", "doi": "10.1039/D2CS00569G", "source_url": "https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2023/cs/d2cs00569g", "year": "2023", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"Spruce-pine ... Rietveld 75-77%; Segal 49-50%; Peak Fitting 42-48%; Amorphous Subtraction 58%\" — Same sample: Rietveld 75-77, Segal 49-50, peak fitting 42-48, amorphous subtraction 58. [Salem KS, Kasera NK, Rahman MA, Jameel H, et al., 2023, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 522, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cotton linter cellulose", "entity_group": "cotton", "entity_class": "native cellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "86.0", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "85-87", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Review", "method_detail": "XRD Rietveld refinement", "conditions": "XRD Rietveld refinement", "conditions_detail": "XRD Rietveld refinement | measurement: XRD Rietveld | allomorph: I | source: cotton linter", "doi": "10.1039/D2CS00569G", "source_url": "https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2023/cs/d2cs00569g", "year": "2023", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"Cotton linter ... Rietveld 85-87%; Segal 55-56%; Peak Fitting 62-67%; Amorphous Subtraction 72.1%\" — Cotton: Rietveld 85-87, Segal 55-56, peak fitting 62-67, amorphous subtraction 72.1. NOTE Segal here is lower than Rietveld (peak-overlap effect in this study's protocol). [Salem KS, Kasera NK, Rahman MA, Jameel H, et al., 2023, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 523, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cotton linter cellulose", "entity_group": "cotton", "entity_class": "native cellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "55.5", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "55-56", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Review", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal peak-height method", "conditions": "XRD, Segal peak-height method", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal peak-height method | measurement: XRD peak height (Segal) | allomorph: I | source: cotton linter", "doi": "10.1039/D2CS00569G", "source_url": "https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2023/cs/d2cs00569g", "year": "2023", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"Cotton linter ... Segal 55-56%\" — Segal value for cotton linter (same sample as Rietveld 85-87% row). [Salem KS, Kasera NK, Rahman MA, Jameel H, et al., 2023, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 524, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "Avicel PH-102 microcrystalline cellulose", "entity_group": "microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)", "entity_class": "pulp / microcrystalline cellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "79.0", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "76-82", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Review", "method_detail": "XRD Rietveld refinement", "conditions": "XRD Rietveld refinement", "conditions_detail": "XRD Rietveld refinement | measurement: XRD Rietveld | allomorph: I | source: Avicel PH-102 (commercial MCC)", "doi": "10.1039/D2CS00569G", "source_url": "https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2023/cs/d2cs00569g", "year": "2023", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"Avicel PH-102 ... Rietveld 76-82%; Segal 49-53%; Peak Fitting 60-65%; Amorphous Subtraction 67%\" — MCC; same sample four methods (Rietveld 76-82, Segal 49-53, peak fitting 60-65, amorphous subtraction 67). [Salem KS, Kasera NK, Rahman MA, Jameel H, et al., 2023, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 525, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "Avicel PH-102 microcrystalline cellulose", "entity_group": "microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)", "entity_class": "pulp / microcrystalline cellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "51.0", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "49-53", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Review", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal peak-height method", "conditions": "XRD, Segal peak-height method", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal peak-height method | measurement: XRD peak height (Segal) | allomorph: I | source: Avicel PH-102 (commercial MCC)", "doi": "10.1039/D2CS00569G", "source_url": "https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2023/cs/d2cs00569g", "year": "2023", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"Avicel PH-102 ... Segal 49-53%\" — Segal value for Avicel PH-102. [Salem KS, Kasera NK, Rahman MA, Jameel H, et al., 2023, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 526, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "moso bamboo cellulose", "entity_group": "bamboo", "entity_class": "native cellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "45.5", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "45-46", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Review", "method_detail": "XRD Rietveld refinement", "conditions": "XRD Rietveld refinement", "conditions_detail": "XRD Rietveld refinement | measurement: XRD Rietveld | allomorph: I | source: moso bamboo", "doi": "10.1039/D2CS00569G", "source_url": "https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2023/cs/d2cs00569g", "year": "2023", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"Moso bamboo ... Rietveld 45-46%; Segal 22-24%; Peak Fitting 20-21%; Amorphous Subtraction 28%\" — Same sample four methods (Rietveld 45-46, Segal 22-24, peak fitting 20-21, amorphous subtraction 28). [Salem KS, Kasera NK, Rahman MA, Jameel H, et al., 2023, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 527, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "lyocell regenerated cellulose fiber", "entity_group": "lyocell/Tencel", "entity_class": "regenerated cellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "44.0", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "0.44", "unit_reported": "fraction", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD crystallinity index (Stana-Kleinschek et al. 2001)", "conditions": "XRD crystallinity index (Stana-Kleinschek et al. 2001)", "conditions_detail": "XRD crystallinity index (Stana-Kleinschek et al. 2001) | measurement: XRD | allomorph: II | source: lyocell fiber (NMMO process)", "doi": "10.15376/biores.13.2.zhang", "source_url": "https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/resources/regenerated-cellulose-by-the-lyocell-process-a-brief-review-of-the-process-and-properties/", "year": "2018", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"The crystallinity index (CrI) of lyocell fibers (0.44) is much higher than that of viscose fibers (0.25) (Stana-Kleinschek et al. 2001).\" — Reported as a fraction (0.44 = 44%). Cellulose II allomorph; original source Stana-Kleinschek et al. 2001. [Zhang S, Chen C, Duan C, et al., 2018, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 528, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "viscose regenerated cellulose fiber", "entity_group": "viscose/rayon", "entity_class": "regenerated cellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "25.0", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "0.25", "unit_reported": "fraction", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD crystallinity index (Stana-Kleinschek et al. 2001)", "conditions": "XRD crystallinity index (Stana-Kleinschek et al. 2001)", "conditions_detail": "XRD crystallinity index (Stana-Kleinschek et al. 2001) | measurement: XRD | allomorph: II | source: viscose rayon fiber", "doi": "10.15376/biores.13.2.zhang", "source_url": "https://bioresources.cnr.ncsu.edu/resources/regenerated-cellulose-by-the-lyocell-process-a-brief-review-of-the-process-and-properties/", "year": "2018", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"The crystallinity index (CrI) of lyocell fibers (0.44) is much higher than that of viscose fibers (0.25) (Stana-Kleinschek et al. 2001).\" — Reported as a fraction (0.25 = 25%). Cellulose II; lowest crystallinity regenerated fiber. [Zhang S, Chen C, Duan C, et al., 2018, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 529, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "Ioncell-F regenerated cellulose fiber", "entity_group": "lyocell/Tencel", "entity_class": "regenerated cellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "60.0", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "0.6", "unit_reported": "fraction", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) with azimuthal analysis; crystalline volume fraction", "conditions": "Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) with azimuthal analysis; crystalline volume fraction", "conditions_detail": "Wide-angle X-ray scattering (WAXS) with azimuthal analysis; crystalline volume fraction | measurement: WAXS volume-fraction analysis | allomorph: II | source: Ioncell-F fiber (ionic-liquid spun, draw ratio >= 5)", "doi": "10.1107/S205225252200570X", "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9252157/", "year": "2022", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"phi_c increases strongly with increasing draw ratio for lower draw-ratio values, and essentially levels off at phi_c = 0.6 +/- 0.05 for DR >= 5\" — Crystalline volume fraction phi_c = 0.60 +/- 0.05 (=60%) for cellulose II regenerated fiber. [Gentile L, Sixta H, Giannini C, Olsson U, 2022, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 530, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cellulose nanocrystals (CNC, oil palm empty fruit bunch)", "entity_group": "cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)", "entity_class": "nanocellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "87.1", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "87.1", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal method | measurement: XRD Segal | allomorph: I | source: oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB), 1.5% H2O2 bleaching, acid hydrolysis", "doi": "10.22146/ajche.83422", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.22146/ajche.83422", "year": "2023", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"Using Segal's equation, the crystallinity index of cellulose is 51.6%, CNCs bleached by 1.5%, H2O2 is 87.1%, and CNCs bleached by 10%, H2O2 is 93%.\" — Raw OPEFB cellulose precursor was 51.6%. [Pranolo SH, et al., 2023, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 531, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cellulose nanocrystals (CNC, oil palm empty fruit bunch)", "entity_group": "cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)", "entity_class": "nanocellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "93.0", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "93", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal method | measurement: XRD Segal | allomorph: I | source: oil palm empty fruit bunch (OPEFB), 10% H2O2 bleaching, acid hydrolysis", "doi": "10.22146/ajche.83422", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.22146/ajche.83422", "year": "2023", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"Using Segal's equation, the crystallinity index of cellulose is 51.6%, CNCs bleached by 1.5%, H2O2 is 87.1%, and CNCs bleached by 10%, H2O2 is 93%.\" — Abstract states 94.0% for the 10% H2O2 CNC; body text says 93% (minor internal inconsistency in the paper). [Pranolo SH, et al., 2023, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 532, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cellulose nanocrystals (CNC, Sansevieria trifasciata)", "entity_group": "cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)", "entity_class": "nanocellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "87.4", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "87.4", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal method | measurement: XRD Segal | allomorph: I | source: Sansevieria trifasciata fibers, ammonium persulfate (APS) oxidation 1.5 M, 70 C", "doi": "10.3390/fib10070061", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.3390/fib10070061", "year": "2022", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"As demonstrated in Table 2, the crystallinity index of the STFs was 52.4%, while the crystallinity index values of CNCs prepared under different APS concentrations of 1.1, 1.5, and 1.9 M were 80, 87.4, and 83.4%, respectively.\" — Optimum CNC; raw Sansevieria fiber was 52.4%. [Indirasetyo EN, Kusmono, 2022, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 533, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cellulose nanocrystals (CNC, Sansevieria trifasciata)", "entity_group": "cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)", "entity_class": "nanocellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "80.0", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "80", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal method | measurement: XRD Segal | allomorph: I | source: Sansevieria trifasciata fibers, APS oxidation 1.1 M", "doi": "10.3390/fib10070061", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.3390/fib10070061", "year": "2022", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"...the crystallinity index values of CNCs prepared under different APS concentrations of 1.1, 1.5, and 1.9 M were 80, 87.4, and 83.4%, respectively.\" — CNC at 1.1 M APS. [Indirasetyo EN, Kusmono, 2022, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 534, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cellulose nanocrystals (CNC, ramie)", "entity_group": "ramie", "entity_class": "nanocellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "90.77", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "90.77", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal method (I_22.5 vs I_18-19)", "conditions": "XRD, Segal method (I_22.5 vs I_18-19)", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal method (I_22.5 vs I_18-19) | measurement: XRD Segal | allomorph: I | source: ramie fibers, 58% H2SO4 hydrolysis, 45 C 30 min", "doi": "10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05486", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05486", "year": "2020", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"The crystallinity index of CNCs prepared at various temperatures of 45, 55, and 65 C was 90.77, 87.99, and 80.32%, respectively.\" — Highest CNC value; untreated ramie 79.75%, purified cellulose 86.68%. [Kusmono, Listyanda RF, Wildan MW, 2020, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 535, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cellulose nanocrystals (CNC, ramie)", "entity_group": "ramie", "entity_class": "nanocellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "80.32", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "80.32", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal method | measurement: XRD Segal | allomorph: I | source: ramie fibers, 58% H2SO4 hydrolysis, 65 C", "doi": "10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05486", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05486", "year": "2020", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"The crystallinity index of CNCs prepared at various temperatures of 45, 55, and 65 C was 90.77, 87.99, and 80.32%, respectively.\" — CNC at 65 C hydrolysis (over-hydrolysis reduces CrI). [Kusmono, Listyanda RF, Wildan MW, 2020, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 536, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "ramie cellulose (purified, pre-CNC)", "entity_group": "ramie", "entity_class": "native cellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "79.75", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "79.75", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions": "XRD, Segal method", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal method | measurement: XRD Segal | allomorph: I | source: untreated ramie fibers", "doi": "10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05486", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05486", "year": "2020", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"the crystallinity index of untreated ramie fibers and CPS were 79.75 and 86.68, respectively.\" — Native ramie fiber; chemically purified cellulose (CPS) = 86.68%. [Kusmono, Listyanda RF, Wildan MW, 2020, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 537, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cellulose nanocrystals (CNC, Egyptian extra-long cotton)", "entity_group": "cotton", "entity_class": "nanocellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "80.0", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "80", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal empirical method", "conditions": "XRD, Segal empirical method", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal empirical method | measurement: XRD Segal | allomorph: I | source: Egyptian extra-long-staple cotton (G.88), 60% H2SO4", "doi": "10.21608/joese.2019.158397", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.21608/joese.2019.158397", "year": "2019", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"the CrI of CNCe was higher than that obtained from CNCm, which was calculated from CNCe and CNCm to be, 80%, 75% respectively using Segal's empirical method (Segal et al. 1959).\" — CNCe from extra-long-staple cotton. [Shaheen TI, El-Gammal MS, Ibrahim HM, 2019, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 538, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cellulose nanocrystals (CNC, Upland medium-staple cotton)", "entity_group": "cotton", "entity_class": "nanocellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "75.0", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "75", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal empirical method", "conditions": "XRD, Segal empirical method", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal empirical method | measurement: XRD Segal | allomorph: I | source: Upland medium-staple cotton (BF FK37), 60% H2SO4", "doi": "10.21608/joese.2019.158397", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.21608/joese.2019.158397", "year": "2019", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"the CrI of CNCe was higher than that obtained from CNCm, which was calculated from CNCe and CNCm to be, 80%, 75% respectively using Segal's empirical method (Segal et al. 1959).\" — CNCm from medium-staple cotton. [Shaheen TI, El-Gammal MS, Ibrahim HM, 2019, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 539, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cellulose nanowhiskers (CNW, bleached eucalyptus pulp)", "entity_group": "cellulose nanocrystal (CNC)", "entity_class": "nanocellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "77.6", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "77.6", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal method II", "conditions": "XRD, Segal method II", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal method II | measurement: XRD Segal (method II) | allomorph: I | source: bleached eucalyptus pulp, maleic acid hydrolysis + mechanical fibrillation (M1-1P)", "doi": "10.3389/fbioe.2020.565084", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.565084", "year": "2020", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"Segal II CrI for M1-1P (77.6%) and M1-3P (74.0%) are lower than that reported for CNCs (81%) produced from concentrated oxalic acid hydrolysis of the same BEP\" — M1-1P sample. M1-3P = 74.0% by same method. [Wang Q, Zhu JY, Ma Q, et al., 2020, confidence: high]" }, { "id": 540, "dataset": "cellulose", "entity": "cellulose nanocrystals (CNC, cotton balls)", "entity_group": "cotton", "entity_class": "nanocellulose", "property": "crystallinity index", "property_key": "crystallinity_index", "value": "77.6", "unit": "%", "value_reported": "77.6", "unit_reported": "%", "method": "Experiment", "method_detail": "XRD, Segal method (I_200 at 2theta=22.7, I_am at 2theta=18)", "conditions": "XRD, Segal method (I_200 at 2theta=22.7, I_am at 2theta=18)", "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal method (I_200 at 2theta=22.7, I_am at 2theta=18) | measurement: XRD Segal | allomorph: I | source: cotton balls, 64% H2SO4 hydrolysis", "doi": "10.4038/josuk.v16i1.8075", "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.4038/josuk.v16i1.8075", "year": "2023", "confidence": "high", "comments": "\"According to the Segal crystallinity index equation, the crystallinity index (CrI) of the extracted cellulose nanocrystal sample was respectively calculated to be 77.6%\" — Cotton-derived CNC. [Samarawickrama SM, Wijayapala UAS, Fernando MAS, 2023, confidence: high]" } ] }