Glyco Property List

HTTP 200 OK
Allow: GET, HEAD, OPTIONS
Content-Type: application/json
Vary: Accept

{
    "count": 839,
    "next": "http://glycodata.org/api/gdd/glyco-properties/?format=api&page=26",
    "previous": "http://glycodata.org/api/gdd/glyco-properties/?format=api&page=24",
    "results": [
        {
            "id": 481,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "lyocell-reinforced AESO composite (60 wt% fiber)",
            "entity_group": "lyocell/Tencel",
            "entity_class": "regenerated cellulose",
            "property": "Young's modulus",
            "property_key": "youngs_modulus",
            "value": "17.0",
            "unit": "GPa",
            "value_reported": "17",
            "unit_reported": "GPa",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "Tensile testing of lyocell non-woven reinforced acrylated epoxidized soybean oil composite (60 wt% fiber)",
            "conditions": "Tensile testing of lyocell non-woven reinforced acrylated epoxidized soybean oil composite (60 wt% fiber)",
            "conditions_detail": "Tensile testing of lyocell non-woven reinforced acrylated epoxidized soybean oil composite (60 wt% fiber) | form: composite | axis: in-plane | test state: dry",
            "doi": "10.1177/0731684413504325",
            "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1177/0731684413504325",
            "year": "2013",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"Lyocell fiber reinforced composites with 60 wt% fiber content had a tensile strength and modulus of about 135 MPa and 17 GPa, respectively.\"  — J Reinf Plast Compos 33(2). Lyocell composite (regenerated-fiber reinforced).  [Ramamoorthy SK, Kundu CK, Adekunle K, 2013, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 482,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "MCC-derived regenerated cellulose fiber",
            "entity_group": "regenerated cellulose (other)",
            "entity_class": "pulp / microcrystalline cellulose",
            "property": "Young's modulus",
            "property_key": "youngs_modulus",
            "value": "5.9",
            "unit": "GPa",
            "value_reported": "5.9",
            "unit_reported": "GPa",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "Tensile testing of cellulose fiber produced from microcrystalline cellulose",
            "conditions": "Tensile testing of cellulose fiber produced from microcrystalline cellulose",
            "conditions_detail": "Tensile testing of cellulose fiber produced from microcrystalline cellulose | form: fiber | axis: axial (along fiber) | test state: dry",
            "doi": "10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.098642",
            "source_url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813025098642",
            "year": "2025",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "comments": "\"Cellulose fibers produced from microcrystalline cellulose showed a Young's modulus of 5.9 GPa and tensile strength of 67 MPa.\"  — Int J Biol Macromol review. DOI inferred from article id (S0141813025098642); confidence medium pending DOI confirmation. MCC-derived fiber.  [et al., 2025, confidence: medium]"
        },
        {
            "id": 483,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "microcrystalline cellulose (MCC), plant cellulose",
            "entity_group": "microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)",
            "entity_class": "pulp / microcrystalline cellulose",
            "property": "Young's modulus",
            "property_key": "youngs_modulus",
            "value": "25.0",
            "unit": "GPa",
            "value_reported": "25",
            "unit_reported": "GPa",
            "method": "Review",
            "method_detail": "Reported Young's modulus of plant-cellulose MCC",
            "conditions": "Reported Young's modulus of plant-cellulose MCC",
            "conditions_detail": "Reported Young's modulus of plant-cellulose MCC | form: microcrystalline cellulose | axis: not specified",
            "doi": "10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2025.098642",
            "source_url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0141813025098642",
            "year": "2025",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "comments": "\"For plant cellulose, the Young's modulus of MCC is approximately 25 GPa.\"  — DOI inferred; confidence medium pending DOI confirmation. Bulk plant-cellulose MCC modulus.  [et al., 2025, confidence: medium]"
        },
        {
            "id": 484,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "cellulose acetate butyrate / bacterial cellulose composite (32 vol%)",
            "entity_group": "bacterial cellulose",
            "entity_class": "cellulose derivative",
            "property": "Young's modulus",
            "property_key": "youngs_modulus",
            "value": "5.8",
            "unit": "GPa",
            "value_reported": "5.8",
            "unit_reported": "GPa",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "Tensile testing of cellulose acetate butyrate reinforced with 32 vol% bacterial cellulose",
            "conditions": "Tensile testing of cellulose acetate butyrate reinforced with 32 vol% bacterial cellulose",
            "conditions_detail": "Tensile testing of cellulose acetate butyrate reinforced with 32 vol% bacterial cellulose | form: film/composite | axis: in-plane | test state: dry",
            "doi": "10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.04.001",
            "source_url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0266353804001174",
            "year": "2004",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "comments": "\"Cellulose acetate butyrate composites reinforced with bacterial cellulose containing 10% and 32% volume cellulose showed a Young's modulus of 3.2 and 5.8 GPa, and a strength of 52.6 and 128.9 MPa, respectively.\"  — DOI inferred; value from search summary. CAB derivative + 32 vol% bacterial cellulose.  [Gindl W, Keckes J, 2004, confidence: medium]"
        },
        {
            "id": 485,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "wet never-dried cellulose pulp fiber (bleached softwood kraft)",
            "entity_group": "dissolving/wood pulp",
            "entity_class": "pulp / microcrystalline cellulose",
            "property": "Young's modulus",
            "property_key": "youngs_modulus",
            "value": "0.0065",
            "unit": "GPa",
            "value_reported": "1-12",
            "unit_reported": "MPa",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "AFM direct force-displacement on never-dried wet fibres immersed in water (BSW kraft pulp)",
            "conditions": "AFM direct force-displacement on never-dried wet fibres immersed in water (BSW kraft pulp)",
            "conditions_detail": "AFM direct force-displacement on never-dried wet fibres immersed in water (BSW kraft pulp) | form: whole fiber | axis: transverse (force-displacement) | test state: wet",
            "doi": "10.1007/s10570-017-1407-6",
            "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1407-6",
            "year": "2017",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"For BSW the modulus of elasticity ranges from 1 to 12 MPa and for TMP between 15-190 MPa.\"  — Cellulose 24(10). Wet never-dried fibres immersed in water; very low modulus (MPa) -- water plasticization. TMP = thermomechanical pulp.  [Pettersson T, Hellwig J, Gustafsson PJ, et al., 2017, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 486,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "wet never-dried cellulose pulp fiber (thermomechanical pulp)",
            "entity_group": "dissolving/wood pulp",
            "entity_class": "pulp / microcrystalline cellulose",
            "property": "Young's modulus",
            "property_key": "youngs_modulus",
            "value": "0.1025",
            "unit": "GPa",
            "value_reported": "15-190",
            "unit_reported": "MPa",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "AFM direct force-displacement on never-dried wet fibres immersed in water (TMP)",
            "conditions": "AFM direct force-displacement on never-dried wet fibres immersed in water (TMP)",
            "conditions_detail": "AFM direct force-displacement on never-dried wet fibres immersed in water (TMP) | form: whole fiber | axis: transverse (force-displacement) | test state: wet",
            "doi": "10.1007/s10570-017-1407-6",
            "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1407-6",
            "year": "2017",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"For BSW the modulus of elasticity ranges from 1 to 12 MPa and for TMP between 15-190 MPa.\"  — Wet TMP fibre modulus in MPa (water-saturated).  [Pettersson T, Hellwig J, Gustafsson PJ, et al., 2017, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 487,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "moist cellulose (longitudinal)",
            "entity_group": "cellulose (generic)",
            "entity_class": "native cellulose",
            "property": "Young's modulus",
            "property_key": "youngs_modulus",
            "value": "134.0",
            "unit": "GPa",
            "value_reported": "134",
            "unit_reported": "GPa",
            "method": "Review",
            "method_detail": "Longitudinal modulus of elasticity of moist cellulose (Salmen 2009), cited",
            "conditions": "Longitudinal modulus of elasticity of moist cellulose (Salmen 2009), cited",
            "conditions_detail": "Longitudinal modulus of elasticity of moist cellulose (Salmen 2009), cited | form: cell-wall polymer | axis: axial (longitudinal) | test state: moist",
            "doi": "10.1007/s10570-017-1407-6",
            "source_url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1407-6",
            "year": "2017",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"for moist cellulose Salmen (2009) gives a value for the longitudinal modulus of elasticity of 134 GPa and only 40 MPa for moist hemicellulose.\"  — Original: Salmen 2009. Longitudinal modulus of moist cellulose (cell-wall).  [Pettersson T, Hellwig J, Gustafsson PJ, et al., 2017, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 488,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "cellulose Ibeta crystal (chain axis [001])",
            "entity_group": "cellulose crystal",
            "entity_class": "native cellulose",
            "property": "Young's modulus",
            "property_key": "youngs_modulus",
            "value": "206.0",
            "unit": "GPa",
            "value_reported": "206",
            "unit_reported": "GPa",
            "method": "Simulation",
            "method_detail": "First-principles DFT with van der Waals interactions; Young's modulus along [001] c-axis (chain direction)",
            "conditions": "First-principles DFT with van der Waals interactions; Young's modulus along [001] c-axis (chain direction)",
            "conditions_detail": "First-principles DFT with van der Waals interactions; Young's modulus along [001] c-axis (chain direction) | form: crystal | axis: axial (chain direction, [001] c-axis)",
            "doi": "10.1007/s10570-013-0071-8",
            "source_url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-013-0071-8",
            "year": "2013",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "comments": "\"The computed Young's modulus is found to be 206 GPa along [001] (c-axis), 98 GPa along [010] (b-axis), and 19 GPa along [100] (a-axis).\"  — Cellulose 20:2703. DFT axial crystal modulus. Quote from search-engine extraction of abstract; not directly fetched (Springer paywalled).  [Dri FL, Hector LG, Moon RJ, Zavattieri PD, 2013, confidence: medium]"
        },
        {
            "id": 489,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "cellulose Ibeta crystal (b-axis [010])",
            "entity_group": "cellulose crystal",
            "entity_class": "native cellulose",
            "property": "Young's modulus",
            "property_key": "youngs_modulus",
            "value": "98.0",
            "unit": "GPa",
            "value_reported": "98",
            "unit_reported": "GPa",
            "method": "Simulation",
            "method_detail": "First-principles DFT with van der Waals interactions; Young's modulus along [010] b-axis (transverse, H-bonded sheet)",
            "conditions": "First-principles DFT with van der Waals interactions; Young's modulus along [010] b-axis (transverse, H-bonded sheet)",
            "conditions_detail": "First-principles DFT with van der Waals interactions; Young's modulus along [010] b-axis (transverse, H-bonded sheet) | form: crystal | axis: transverse ([010] b-axis)",
            "doi": "10.1007/s10570-013-0071-8",
            "source_url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-013-0071-8",
            "year": "2013",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "comments": "\"The computed Young's modulus is found to be 206 GPa along [001] (c-axis), 98 GPa along [010] (b-axis), and 19 GPa along [100] (a-axis).\"  — DFT transverse (b-axis) crystal modulus. Quote from search-engine extraction of abstract.  [Dri FL, Hector LG, Moon RJ, Zavattieri PD, 2013, confidence: medium]"
        },
        {
            "id": 490,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "cellulose Ibeta crystal (a-axis [100])",
            "entity_group": "cellulose crystal",
            "entity_class": "native cellulose",
            "property": "Young's modulus",
            "property_key": "youngs_modulus",
            "value": "19.0",
            "unit": "GPa",
            "value_reported": "19",
            "unit_reported": "GPa",
            "method": "Simulation",
            "method_detail": "First-principles DFT with van der Waals interactions; Young's modulus along [100] a-axis (transverse, vdW-stacked)",
            "conditions": "First-principles DFT with van der Waals interactions; Young's modulus along [100] a-axis (transverse, vdW-stacked)",
            "conditions_detail": "First-principles DFT with van der Waals interactions; Young's modulus along [100] a-axis (transverse, vdW-stacked) | form: crystal | axis: transverse ([100] a-axis)",
            "doi": "10.1007/s10570-013-0071-8",
            "source_url": "https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10570-013-0071-8",
            "year": "2013",
            "confidence": "medium",
            "comments": "\"The computed Young's modulus is found to be 206 GPa along [001] (c-axis), 98 GPa along [010] (b-axis), and 19 GPa along [100] (a-axis).\"  — DFT transverse (a-axis) crystal modulus -- lowest direction. Quote from search-engine extraction of abstract.  [Dri FL, Hector LG, Moon RJ, Zavattieri PD, 2013, confidence: medium]"
        },
        {
            "id": 491,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "cellulose crystal (DFT elastic modulus)",
            "entity_group": "cellulose crystal",
            "entity_class": "native cellulose",
            "property": "Young's modulus",
            "property_key": "youngs_modulus",
            "value": "141.34",
            "unit": "GPa",
            "value_reported": "141.34",
            "unit_reported": "GPa",
            "method": "Simulation",
            "method_detail": "DFT calculation of elastic modulus of cellulose crystal",
            "conditions": "DFT calculation of elastic modulus of cellulose crystal",
            "conditions_detail": "DFT calculation of elastic modulus of cellulose crystal | form: crystal | axis: not fully specified (reported as elastic modulus)",
            "doi": "10.1016/j.matchemphys.2025.011605",
            "source_url": "https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0254058425011605",
            "year": "2025",
            "confidence": "low",
            "comments": "\"DFT calculations evaluated the Elastic modulus, shearing modulus, and bulk modulus, which were determined to be 141.34 GPa, 63.57 GPa, and 60.68 GPa, respectively.\"  — DOI inferred from article id (S0254058425011605); confidence low pending DOI confirmation. DFT elastic modulus of cellulose.  [et al., 2025, confidence: low]"
        },
        {
            "id": 492,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "bacterial microcrystalline cellulose (BMCC)",
            "entity_group": "bacterial cellulose",
            "entity_class": "native cellulose",
            "property": "crystallinity index",
            "property_key": "crystallinity_index",
            "value": "95.2",
            "unit": "%",
            "value_reported": "95.2",
            "unit_reported": "%",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "XRD, Segal peak-height method (after baseline subtraction)",
            "conditions": "XRD, Segal peak-height method (after baseline subtraction)",
            "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal peak-height method (after baseline subtraction) | measurement: XRD peak height (Segal) | allomorph: I | source: bacterial microcrystalline cellulose",
            "doi": "10.1186/1754-6834-3-10",
            "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890632/",
            "year": "2010",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"BMCC ... XRD peak height 95.2%\"  — Table 2 of the canonical method-comparison paper; same sample measured by four methods (this row = peak height).  [Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK, 2010, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 493,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "bacterial microcrystalline cellulose (BMCC)",
            "entity_group": "bacterial cellulose",
            "entity_class": "native cellulose",
            "property": "crystallinity index",
            "property_key": "crystallinity_index",
            "value": "73.1",
            "unit": "%",
            "value_reported": "73.1",
            "unit_reported": "%",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "XRD peak deconvolution",
            "conditions": "XRD peak deconvolution",
            "conditions_detail": "XRD peak deconvolution | measurement: XRD deconvolution | allomorph: I | source: bacterial microcrystalline cellulose",
            "doi": "10.1186/1754-6834-3-10",
            "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890632/",
            "year": "2010",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"BMCC ... XRD deconvolution 73.1%\"  — Same BMCC sample as peak-height row; deconvolution gives lower value.  [Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK, 2010, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 494,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "bacterial microcrystalline cellulose (BMCC)",
            "entity_group": "bacterial cellulose",
            "entity_class": "native cellulose",
            "property": "crystallinity index",
            "property_key": "crystallinity_index",
            "value": "82.4",
            "unit": "%",
            "value_reported": "82.4",
            "unit_reported": "%",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "XRD amorphous subtraction",
            "conditions": "XRD amorphous subtraction",
            "conditions_detail": "XRD amorphous subtraction | measurement: XRD amorphous subtraction | allomorph: I | source: bacterial microcrystalline cellulose",
            "doi": "10.1186/1754-6834-3-10",
            "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890632/",
            "year": "2010",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"BMCC ... XRD amorphous subtraction 82.4%\"  — Same BMCC sample, amorphous-subtraction method.  [Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK, 2010, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 495,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "bacterial microcrystalline cellulose (BMCC)",
            "entity_group": "bacterial cellulose",
            "entity_class": "native cellulose",
            "property": "crystallinity index",
            "property_key": "crystallinity_index",
            "value": "73.8",
            "unit": "%",
            "value_reported": "73.8",
            "unit_reported": "%",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "13C CP/MAS NMR, C4 peak separation",
            "conditions": "13C CP/MAS NMR, C4 peak separation",
            "conditions_detail": "13C CP/MAS NMR, C4 peak separation | measurement: NMR C4 peak separation | allomorph: I | source: bacterial microcrystalline cellulose",
            "doi": "10.1186/1754-6834-3-10",
            "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890632/",
            "year": "2010",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"BMCC ... NMR C4 peak separation 73.8%\"  — Same BMCC sample by solid-state 13C NMR.  [Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK, 2010, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 496,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "Avicel PH-101 microcrystalline cellulose",
            "entity_group": "microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)",
            "entity_class": "pulp / microcrystalline cellulose",
            "property": "crystallinity index",
            "property_key": "crystallinity_index",
            "value": "91.7",
            "unit": "%",
            "value_reported": "91.7",
            "unit_reported": "%",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "XRD, Segal peak-height method (after baseline subtraction)",
            "conditions": "XRD, Segal peak-height method (after baseline subtraction)",
            "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal peak-height method (after baseline subtraction) | measurement: XRD peak height (Segal) | allomorph: I | source: Avicel PH-101 (commercial MCC, wood-derived)",
            "doi": "10.1186/1754-6834-3-10",
            "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890632/",
            "year": "2010",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"We found the value for Avicel PH-101 to be 91.7% using the XRD peak height method after baseline subtraction\"  — 91.7 +/- 1.5%. Would be 81.0% without baseline subtraction.  [Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK, 2010, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 497,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "Avicel PH-101 microcrystalline cellulose",
            "entity_group": "microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)",
            "entity_class": "pulp / microcrystalline cellulose",
            "property": "crystallinity index",
            "property_key": "crystallinity_index",
            "value": "60.6",
            "unit": "%",
            "value_reported": "60.6",
            "unit_reported": "%",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "XRD peak deconvolution",
            "conditions": "XRD peak deconvolution",
            "conditions_detail": "XRD peak deconvolution | measurement: XRD deconvolution | allomorph: I | source: Avicel PH-101 (commercial MCC)",
            "doi": "10.1186/1754-6834-3-10",
            "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890632/",
            "year": "2010",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"Avicel PH-101 ... XRD deconvolution 60.6 +/- 1.0%\"  — 60.6 +/- 1.0%; same Avicel sample as peak-height row.  [Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK, 2010, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 498,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "Avicel PH-101 microcrystalline cellulose",
            "entity_group": "microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)",
            "entity_class": "pulp / microcrystalline cellulose",
            "property": "crystallinity index",
            "property_key": "crystallinity_index",
            "value": "77.7",
            "unit": "%",
            "value_reported": "77.7",
            "unit_reported": "%",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "XRD amorphous subtraction",
            "conditions": "XRD amorphous subtraction",
            "conditions_detail": "XRD amorphous subtraction | measurement: XRD amorphous subtraction | allomorph: I | source: Avicel PH-101 (commercial MCC)",
            "doi": "10.1186/1754-6834-3-10",
            "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890632/",
            "year": "2010",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"Avicel PH-101 ... XRD amorphous subtraction 77.7 +/- 1.9%\"  — 77.7 +/- 1.9%.  [Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK, 2010, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 499,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "Avicel PH-101 microcrystalline cellulose",
            "entity_group": "microcrystalline cellulose (MCC)",
            "entity_class": "pulp / microcrystalline cellulose",
            "property": "crystallinity index",
            "property_key": "crystallinity_index",
            "value": "56.7",
            "unit": "%",
            "value_reported": "56.7",
            "unit_reported": "%",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "13C CP/MAS NMR, C4 peak separation",
            "conditions": "13C CP/MAS NMR, C4 peak separation",
            "conditions_detail": "13C CP/MAS NMR, C4 peak separation | measurement: NMR C4 peak separation | allomorph: I | source: Avicel PH-101 (commercial MCC)",
            "doi": "10.1186/1754-6834-3-10",
            "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890632/",
            "year": "2010",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"Avicel PH-101 ... NMR C4 peak separation 56.7 +/- 2.2%\"  — 56.7 +/- 2.2%; NMR gives the lowest value for the same Avicel sample (vs 91.7% by peak height).  [Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK, 2010, confidence: high]"
        },
        {
            "id": 500,
            "dataset": "cellulose",
            "entity": "SigmaCell 50 cellulose",
            "entity_group": "cellulose (generic)",
            "entity_class": "pulp / microcrystalline cellulose",
            "property": "crystallinity index",
            "property_key": "crystallinity_index",
            "value": "91.2",
            "unit": "%",
            "value_reported": "91.2",
            "unit_reported": "%",
            "method": "Experiment",
            "method_detail": "XRD, Segal peak-height method",
            "conditions": "XRD, Segal peak-height method",
            "conditions_detail": "XRD, Segal peak-height method | measurement: XRD peak height (Segal) | allomorph: I | source: SigmaCell 50 (commercial cellulose)",
            "doi": "10.1186/1754-6834-3-10",
            "source_url": "https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2890632/",
            "year": "2010",
            "confidence": "high",
            "comments": "\"SigmaCell 50 ... XRD peak height 91.2%\"  — Table 2.  [Park S, Baker JO, Himmel ME, Parilla PA, Johnson DK, 2010, confidence: high]"
        }
    ]
}